Journal of the meeting September 2022

September 25 2022

September 25th, day 1. 16h20 - First discussions – Geert, Jan & Bram Amongst us there’s a feeling that we miss a hands-on layer before the wiki. Reason might bet hat the wiki is ‘public’ and thus a publishing tool. That we should not forget, though, it is a link we distribute – so we will need to provide content. As said before, we would do the evaluation of the wiki is december. But can we imagine a practical inbetween stage for the wiki? A place to keep track of what interests us and what we are working on – and maybe drafts to publish later on the wiki. Proposal to work with personal folders on the google drive – that are consultable for others. And they can consist of: References/literature Traces of discussions and/or meetings Texts we are working on that we’d like to share among us. It would generate a context where we can follow each other in thinking and thinking-processes – before we publish more open. Convinced that i twill not replace the drive but will generate for it. Geert prepared the folders on the drive

17h25 – general overview of the year at KASK/ schoolyear ’22-’23 – Geert, Jan, Emese, Bram & Minna What is our joined agenda: involvement in the 2d year performance (6 days) – Oct – Dec ’22 Geert prepared a document on the drive/recap of the meeting: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jiLAYoET0VmAZR6r4DNLAAZXyOIrmJrQZQanHD6-T14/edit#heading=h.q9c1dg7psr5f Proposal KASK – 1st semester/12 ‘full’ Thursdays – class by Heike ‘open atelier’ Heike interested in light, as startingpoint. Conceptual questions – what do we light as: when do we give attention, awareness, presence? Performativity. Proposal Ezra: focus on four aspects - time, color, direction and intensity/ one or two of us to introduce these themes. And start working with these groups. The classes will happen in a studio without real tech possibilities, which can challenge us to work light without tech. How to proceed on this agenda: please check google doc and provide Ezra with dates that work for you. So she can make the puzzle with Heike.

Gangplank (Berlin). Proposal to see how we structure this week as an experiment and proposal to intervene in Gangplank with a similar idea of sessions, without programming full days.

Projectweek starting march 20th – first outlines: As said in the application, we will have tot hink of a way to bachelor-proof. A proposal could bet o tot his in the context of the projectweek: it has the right timing and guaranteed presence from the RL-group. Meaning that students that participated in previous projectweek, or students from the performance trajectory can pass by to ask questions on their project. We could structure the week in mornings that are programmed – like last year and us being present in the afternoon in som esort of ‘open class’ – to host one-on-one or group-questions. Initiative tob e taken by students though. Open question: do we keep an open invitation for the projectweek or do we prefer to focus on performing arts. How actively can/do we want to open up to film, plastic arts, …? Undecided but a remark from Jan: the link between the auditive and the visual is very fast made. With even some shared discourse. Can we not find an interesting tool for explanation there? Canw e not ask other departments to brainstorm on light – how they would talk on light using their discours. Which could be an interesting input for us. E.g. What does musical impressions represent in light – see also: Sloterdijk’s Sound and Light.